A lot of my research looks at how to move particles around, particles about 100 nanometres across. For example when we made stratified coatings we did this with a mixture of particles of sizes 60 and 400 nanometres. The corona virus (see above) is about 100 nanometres across. Viruses are barely alive. They have no metabolism themselves, no more than the inert colloidal particles my colleagues and I study. The virus above has the genetic material in the centre, surrounded by a protein coat. The red things are its spike proteins, that help it enter and infect a cell. The colours above are false, I think it is reconstructed from electron (not light) microscopy.
Yesterday I attended a seminar by a speaker from a big pharmaceutical company. She talked about techniques to look at drug molecules in single cells. This is very very hard, which is why it is very much a work in progress. Each one of our cells is tiny, a fraction of a tenth of a millimetre across, and so invisible to the naked eye. But this is still large enough to be home to billions of protein molecules, of thousands of different types. Most drug molecules work by targeting a particular one type of protein molecule.
Convection is a fact of life, it is occurring right now in the air around your body. Your body temperature of 37 C is higher than the room temperature, so your body heat is warming air, and this warm air is rising — which is convection. Warm air is lighter than colder air and so due to gravity the lighter warmer air rises, and the heavier colder air falls. So convection occurs in the air in the rooms of your house and place of work. Convection is also key to how both the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans behave. Hot air is constantly rising in the atmosphere, and dense water is constantly falling in the oceans (and seas, lakes, …).
With excellent timing, just as I prepared to tell students in my biological physics lectures that we are roughly 20% protein (by mass), and that gelatin is a very abundant protein, which holds our tissues together, The Guardian ran an article on how cool gelatin desserts, aka jellies are. The article included the, slightly odd in my opinion, YouTube video above.
One of the classic mistakes you can make as a teacher is to spot what you fondly think is a small gap in the curriculum, and then commit to filling it. The not-so-small gap is in our teaching of data analysis. Analysing data is, as I just said to our second years, a key part of doing science. As I also said to them, it is poor practice to use formulas or software such as Excel without knowing what they are doing. Both of these statements are true. The problem is that data analysis is a huge subject, and it is underpinned by lots of maths whose details I don’t know myself and will not be teaching to the students. So, by committing to do one extra lecture to try and improve matters here, I bit off a bit more than I could chew.
Of course, you should never serve champagne at room temperature, champagne.fr recommends 8 to 10 C. But an interesting paper by Liger-Belair and coworkers reckons that you can actually form (tiny) ice crystals if you pop a bottle of luke warm champagne. Surprisingly, the warmer the champagne the colder the expanding gas of the champagne pop gets.
One of the (many) things that makes middle aged academics like me grumpy, is students giving answers like speed = 4.738281 m/s, by just copying the number from the screen of their calculator/mobile-phone-app, without any thought at all. But I am actually paid to do something more constructive that be grumpy about this sort of poor practice, so this year I have done a little set of notes on accuracy for my final year class. They take the students through a couple of examples.
Forty years ago Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin introduced what they called spandrels, to the field of evolutionary biology. My impression is that this idea has been controversial in evolutionary biology ever since. Spandrels in the original sense of the word are illustrated above. The word spandrel comes from architecture, and basically it refers to the parts of the arches above which have the blue discs with a relief person in them. They are the spaces between the arch and the roof. The point that inspired Gould and Lewontin, is that arches are directly functional parts of archtecture, they hold up the roof. But by their very nature arches leave gaps, that is unavoidable but not directly functional. These gaps can be filled in by spandrels, which themselves are not directly functional — the ceiling will not collapse if they are removed.
I am revising a numerical physics course for the forthcoming semester, in particular the bits about data analysis. So I have been reading a couple of books to both learn from them, and to see if they could be useful to the students. One compact but good summary is The Data Loom by Stephen Few. It is quite introductory and short, so I am thinking that it could be good to recommend to the students. It covers a lot of ground and I like the author’s practical, sceptical tone. It is also has some excellent examples.
Above are droplets of balsamic vinegar (mainly water, but tastier of course) in olive oil. Water and oil phase separate, hence the droplets. The droplets above are maybe a few millimetres across, and they won’t move unless you stir the oil. This blog post is about much smaller droplets, too small to be seen with the eye, so the picture above of much larger droplets, will have to do. Smaller droplets can move. And two scientists working in Darmstadt in Germany, Hajian and Hardt, have seen small droplets move, which is not so surprising. But what is surprising is that they then dissolved.